review comment

[POLS G4612] Contemporary Continental Political Thought

Departments: Political Science

Professors: Jean Cohen

September 16, 2009

Cohen, Jean
[POLS G4612] Contemporary Continental Political Thought

Jean Cohen is clearly very smart but she isn't able to articulate her thoughts in a un-neurotic, digressive way. The topics and political scientists we studied were extremely interesting however and her TA, Axel, did quite a lot to clarify the material. Definitely though, Global Justice is easier to understand than Political Thought. Also there will be graduate students, they will dominate the discussion, and they will confuse you.

Workload:

A lot of reading, take home midterm and finals, A- to B+ definitely do-able without investing too much time in the readings

April 25, 2007

Cohen, Jean
[POLS G4612] Contemporary Continental Political Thought

Professor Cohen presents a vast array of european political theorists with a detached eye that allows the strengths and weaknesses of each theorist to come through without being clouded by the personal biases of the professor. The class was the strongest when Professor Cohen presented and led the class as well as highlighted important ideas in the works.
The only two criticism I could find with the class was that often a few students in the class dominated the class, not with discussion but with bluster and arguments which did not serve to clarify any of the important points made by the writers. Professor Cohen was easily drawn into these arguments and then flustered by them. Perhaps because of this, the connections between the authors was not as clear as they could have been.

However, the professor was always willing to entertain ideas and to hear people out. She also had an engaging teaching style that brought clarity to the key points of the readings. THe books on the long reading list, though expensive, were well worth adding to my library.

Workload:

Readings, Presentation, Paper

March 02, 2002

Cohen, Jean
[POLS G4612] Contemporary Continental Political Thought

Please keep in mind that this review is more than 5 years old.

As with most political theory courses in the political science dept, Jean Cohen's lectures are delivered with the graduate student in mind. This, despite the course being listed in the undergraduate Columbia College bulletin, leads to a situation where the professor assumes prior knowledge and lectures that are rarely helpful for the undergraduate beginning to develop a more thorough understanding of political thought. This course was unsatisfactory for several reasons. First, continental thought is impenetrable to begin with. In a department that is known for analytical Anglo-American political theory, Cohen's attempts to elucidate continental theory was not very helpful, often falling back on the lingo of the contintental theorists' themselves. A second problem had to do with the delivery of the lectures themselves. The lecture was a two-hour session that met only once a week. Because of this, there was not much time for students to raise questions on texts that are surely difficult to understand. Third, the reading list was much too long to get through for a week. To be sure, Cohen separated core texts from suggested readings for the graduate students, but even then, the readings did not fit in well with her lectures. I would recommend only students with the most committed interest in continental political thought to take this course. Otherwise, better stick with the more mainstream political theorists in the department--i.e., Johnston, Barry, Elster.

Workload:

Enormous reading list for each week, which doesn't really need to be done. Final exam only.

Directory Data

Dept/Subj Directory Course Professor Year Semester Time Section
POLS / POLS POLS POLS G4612: Contemp Continentl Pltcl Thght Jean Cohen 2002 Spring R / 2:10- 4:00 PM 1