This class with this professor is one of those that people either love or hate. Or both. I was a little of both.
The positive (which outweighs the negative):
- Boerger knows her stuff very, very well, and is incredibly passionate about it. I don't think it's possible not to get excited about Bach during her lectures (even to a classical violinist who has played Bach partitas ad nauseum).
- There's a textbook, but readings are optional and everything you need to know is covered in lecture (but copying her blackboard notes is essential!), except a few quiz questions, which she gives you beforehand.
- You get a very thorough overview of Western music and the history that surrounded it.
- She is a fantastic writing coach--much, much better than the FYS teacher I had at the time--and wants you to become a better writer, too.
The negative:
- Boerger usually came into class sort of angry (usually not about the class) and took it out on us, but she always cheered up after 10 or 15 minutes of teaching, and you could tell she loved the class.
- My section had 15 very quiet people in it. She became frustrated when nobody answered questions, we got timid whenever she was frustrated, she became more frustrated...
- I think pre-1600 Western music is sort of boring, especially if you've played classical music before. Some of it is beautiful. Most of it is totally predictable. Never took the second semester for scheduling reasons--that one might be better...
- If you don't like writing, and working hard at it, the essays are a bitch.
- Lots of memorization
Boerger is such a great resource--I just wish the class was conducted a little more effectively. I still learned a lot and found a lot of music I love.
Three essays (they need to be well-written!), seven (I think?) listening quizzes, which take intense studying...the night before, and a final, which is not too difficult if you've taken good notes.
I'm nearly tone-deaf and I loved this class. Hated the final (basically a three-hour vocabulary test), and the three listening quizzes throughout the semester were murder (but that might not be true if you're not, you know, tone deaf), but the lectures are awesome: fascinating and fun, all at once. Prof. Boerger is willing to explain concepts as simple as a "note," over and over and over again, and she's also willing to go off on tangents about concepts that interest her students; you can tell that she loves talking about music, and will happily do it under pretty much any conditions. She's tough about deadlines, though -- the papers are totally doable if you put in a reasonable amount of work, but don't even *think* of turning them in late.
Kristina Boerger is really one of the best professors I've had at this university. She's incredibly enthusiastic and friendly, as well as extremely accessible. She's knows a TON about music, and obviously loves what she does and isn't afraid to show it (and she wants everyone else to love music too!). Her lectures are fun, well-organized, and packed with info. I came into this class with a pretty extensive musical backgroud, but I still learned a lot and wasn't bored at all. I also had friends in my class who started out knowing very little about music, but they loved the class too and felt that they got a lot out of it. Gail Archer teaches the other section of this class but she's terrible, so I'd suggest taking Intro. to Music with Boerger instead -- she's amazing! Definitely don't leave this university without taking a class with her.
Not too bad: three papers (approx. 5 pages each), three small listening quizzes, occasional reading in the textbook, and a final (no midterm!).
Directory Data
| Dept/Subj | Directory Course | Professor | Year | Semester | Time | Section |
|---|


Gold
Silver