review comment

Restoration Literature from 1660-1740

Departments: English and Comparative Literature

Professors: Michael Seidel

December 31, 1999

Seidel, Michael Silver_nugget
Restoration Literature from 1660-1740

Please keep in mind that this review is more than 5 years old.

Don't ask how come I or anyone else bothered to take this class. You couldn't pick a duller time in British history--nothing happened. Really. People were happy with the monarchy and didn't do much. Speaking of not doing much, neither did Seidel. Except for his brief display of adoration for Daniel Dafoe, the class was pretty darn boring (which may explain why it is no longer offered). Majority of the reading involved the heroic couplets of Alexander Pope (snooze). The rest included a couple of short plays, as well as two novels. Grading was a joke, since nearly everyone received A's and reading was relatively unnecessary. Take Seidel in the spring semester. He's an avid Yankee buff (wrote a book on them, too) and usually zones out whenever they enter the fall classic--which, as of late, is virtually guaranteed.

Workload:

midterm (total joke), journal entries (write freely) and final (also pretty damn easy). You should slap yourself if you don't get an A from Seidel.

Directory Data

Dept/Subj Directory Course Professor Year Semester Time Section